Alternative MethodsConventional Methods


A Bad Job is Harder on Your Mental Health than Unemployment
Mar 29, 2018

Grace Armstrong
Core Spirit member since Dec 24, 2020
Reading time 3 min.

There can be no doubt that the job market has been more resilient since the financial crisis than many imagined. Unemployment did not rise as far as was feared and the recovery in employment to pre-recession levels has been quicker than forecast by even the most optimistic labour economists. So, time for some self-congratulatory back-slapping among policy makers then? On the surface of things, at least, it looks like a jobs miracle, despite the belt-tightening of austerity.

Unfortunately, having studied the quality of jobs which many people in the United Kingdom are now doing, this is not entirely the case. The UK labor market is, indeed, performing well but we have a growing and potentially corrosive problem of poor quality, precarious and temporary work which threatens our productivity and competitiveness, levels of social inclusion and, ultimately, the health of the workforce.

Many will argue that this contingent work is essential if we are to have a flexible labor market and this, of course, has always been the case. But how about the effects of this kind of work on the people doing it?

My research has focused on the relationship between the kinds of contingent work that has poor psychosocial quality and the mental health of the workers doing it. And findings force us to ask, perhaps heretically, whether we are actually always better off in work.

Work and well-being

Psychosocial job quality involves the degree to which jobs promote control, autonomy, challenge, variety and task discretion. It effects the extent to which work enhances or diminishes our psychological well-being.

There’s a clear link between being engaged in “good work” and mental health. An important contribution to our understanding of this link has come from the Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey in Australia. It brings together a robust set of data that can be easily compared with other situations such as unemployment. The results, published by Peter Butterworth and colleagues at the Australian National University have global resonance for countries that are serious about developing an understanding of what being “better off” in work really means, beyond narrow economic definitions.

The received wisdom is that being out of work is a bad thing

The received wisdom is that being out of work is a bad thing. It certainly is bad, as we know, for income. It is also bad for self-esteem, dignity, social inclusion, relationships and health. So, all other things being equal, a policy position that promotes getting people back into work is both rational and evidence-based.

But, building on this position, and especially during a period of high unemployment, the received wisdom also tells us that any job is a good job. This axiom informs current UK policy towards compulsory work experience and the “workfare” or “work-for-benefits” thinking which many politicians now favor.

Worse than unemployment

Being in poor-quality work which, perhaps, is boring, routine or represents underemployment or a poor match for the employee’s skills is widely regarded as a good way for the unemployed to remain connected to the labor market — and to keep the work habit. But Butterworth’s data contradicts this. The HILDA data shows unambiguously that the psychosocial quality of bad jobs is worse than unemployment. Butterworth looked at those moving from unemployment into employment and found that:

Those who moved into optimal jobs showed significant improvement in mental health compared to those who remained unemployed. Those respondents who moved into poor-quality jobs showed a significant worsening in their mental health compared to those who remained unemployed.

So now we have a slightly different answer to the question about the unemployed being better off in work. Yes they are, as long as they are in good-quality jobs. If they are in bad jobs, there is a perversely strong chance that they will be worse off — especially in terms of their mental health.

Again, for those who think that there should be punitive undertones to policies to get unemployed people back to work would do well to question whether the “any job is a good job” maxim is as accurate as they like to think. Moreover, we should probably question whether the revolving-door characteristics of some policies in which many people fall back out of work soon after being found a job might — in part — owe their poor performance to the damaging psychosocial quality of the work itself.

This shouldn’t stop us from straining every sinew to help people find work. But it should make us think a lot more about how the quality of jobs can affect our health and productivity. Even in a recession, the uncomfortable truth may be that “any job” may not be a good job at all.

STEPHEN BEVAN for The Conversation


Leave your comments / questions for this practitioner

To write a comment please
or
Services
Category filter
Concern filter
Type filter
Sort
 

All categories

This category is currently empty though we are working on it. Please review services from the similar categories below.
Go to all Services

Related Articles

View All
23 min.
Social Psychology
Apr 1 2021
The Decoding of the Human Spirit: A Synergy of Spirituality and Character Strengths Toward Wholeness

Little consideration has been given to the necessary connection between character qualities and otherworldliness (the quest for or communing with the consecrated to determine importance and reason). The study of character qualities has flooded as of late …

25 min.
Social Psychology
Apr 3 2021
The Psychology of Groups

This module expects that a careful comprehension of individuals requires an intensive comprehension of gatherings. Every one of us is a self-ruling individual looking for our own goals, yet we are likewise individuals from gatherings—bunches that oblige u…

Mary Miller
Social Psychology
Jun 21 2021
Defining Normal: The Breaks in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia as an issue is very cultural.
As North America writes it off as insane. If we took the entire “healthy” community everyone could be prescribed medication. Something could be wrong with everyone, with these protocols.
But you take specific vi…

Ian Hosein
3 min.
Social Psychology
Mar 20 2021
The Ethereal Relationship Between Thought-structures and Egregore

Thought-structures and Egregore In the history

At the point when we consider Egregore, the principal thought that rings a bell is to be a connected thing to bunches identified with otherworldliness, however truly, it is substantially more than that. Egre…

Mary Miller